If Sophos' claims are correct, Apple Hermes Handbags wouldn't be the aboriginal OS maker to accumulate some aegis fixes secret. Microsoft admiral in May accepted that they don't address all the aegis shortcomings in their software. Redmond's non-disclosure of patches was appear by Core Aegis Technologies, which apparent three undocumented fixes in contempo Microsoft software upgrades.
Does an operating arrangement bell-ringer accept a albatross to acknowledge all of its aegis patches to its users? The catechism is replica purses decidedly pertinent to Apple, which has continued trumpeted the Mac as the safer another to Windows PCs.
Cluley believes that Apple's business action has contributed to a apocryphal faculty of aegis a part of Mac users: "Unfortunately, abounding replica watches Mac users assume absent to aegis threats which can run on their computers. And that isn't helped if Apple issues an zhjchv0619 anti-malware aegis amend like this by stealth, rather than allegorical the accessible what it has done. You accept to admiration whether their befitting quiet about an anti-malware aegis amend like this was for business reasons. 'Shh! Don't acquaint association that we accept to assure adjoin malware on Mac OS X!' "
Apple advisers are generally "the affliction offenders if it comes to giving users aegis advice," says Cluley, who adds that a above replica rolex watches aide of his, while visiting an Apple Store recently, overheard a staffer acquaint a chump that it was "impossible" for Macs to get viruses, and that Mac users shouldn't "even anguish about it."
Security patches are a electronics-focus actuality of activity for OS makers. For a bell-ringer like Apple, fixes of this attributes can be decidedly embarrassing. What do you think? Should Cupertino discharge the beans on every anti-malware advancement it issues?
